Sign in to follow this  
Shashank_GTO

New McLaren P1: The MADDEST Thing on 4 Wheels!!! And its a Hybrid...

Recommended Posts

post-50246-0-06050100-1392103649.jpg

post-50246-0-62426900-1392103721.jpg

post-50246-0-50604800-1392103757.jpg

I have to admit, I am a big Top Gear UK fan.

In Series 21 Episode 2, Jeremy Clarkson reviews the New McLaren P1.

(It was aired in the UK on BBC Two on 9th February 2014 and will be aired in India on AXN on 14th February 2014 at 09:00 p.m.)

Here is what Jeremy Clarkson had to say:

(Following are his exact words, no editing whatsoever!)

Many of us will have driven a car that is powerful enough to spin its wheels as you change into second gear. Some may have been fortunate enough to drive a car that can produce a little chirrup as you do a full-bore upchange to third. But the new McLaren P1 goes further than that: if the road's a bit greasy, it will spin its wheels all the way through fourth.

We've seen fast cars before. There have been Koenigseggs and Paganis, and the Ferrari F12 doesn't exactly hang about. Then, lower down the food chain, there have been a selection of lightweight pocket rockets like the Ariel Atom and the Caterham R500. But we have never encountered anything quite like the P1. This takes our perception of speed to a new level.

My mate Niki Faulkner, who doubled as James Hunt in the movie Rush and has won many races in his time, emerged from a lap of Spa in the P1 wearing the face of a man who's spent his life flying Spitfires. And had just been for a spin in the English Electric Lightning. He looked a little bit astonished. And if you peered into his eyes, which had been pushed round the side of his head, a tiny bit frightened.

Later, after my stint, I came into the pits with mildly soiled underwear and said to the team of mechanics: "I don't want to sound pathetic or anything, but would you mind awfully taking that bloody thing out of Race mode."

The trouble was that as I belted round, I'd been trying to deliver my pieces to camera, and I hadn't managed to complete a single one without interrupting myself with a sudden, wide-eyed "******* hell". "This car," I'd say, "has a 3.8-litre, twin-turbocharged V8 which produces... ******* hell." Then later, through Eau Rouge: "The feel of the steering puts me in mind of the feel you get from a Ferrari 458. It feels light and yet... oh, ******* hell."

In Race mode, the car hunkers down by 50mm, and the rear wing grows into a slab that can generate 600kg of downforce. It's supposed to make the whole thing grippier and stickier and more planted. But, on a wet day, it makes it feel nervous and skittish. And every time you go near the throttle, the instant torque of the electric motor kicks the back end out of shape. You have about four heart attacks and six adrenaline surges every 10 seconds.

In the rain, it's better to leave everything in Sport. That way, you only have a heart attack every half hour or so. And yet. The previous day, I had been driving this incredible game-changer around the Belgian city of Bruges in electric mode. It had been silent and light, and the all-round visibility was good. It was a better urban car for these eco times than a G-Wiz. Mainly because, even with the petrol motor shut down, you still have 176bhp at your disposal.

So, to sum up the story so far. This is a car that can scare the bejesus out of a seasoned racing driver. It's a car that can ruin every single piece to camera you try to make. And yet, around town, it's Al Gore with a windscreen wiper.

This is because the P1 is a hybrid. It works on the same sort of principle as a Toyota Prius. However, unlike the Prius, you can go more than a yard in eco thrust mode. You can actually do seven miles before you need to engage that V8 generator. Then, you have a combined output of - stand by - 903bhp.

You're scoffing, aren't you? Because of course, the Bugatti Veyron SS has 280 more than that. Correct. But the Bugatti has four-wheel drive and weighs about the same as St Paul's Cathedral. The P1, on the other hand, is rear-drive, and the only weight of any note comes from the air passing over the body.

The air is a major factor with the P1. The team behind the car say the entire body was not designed, it was engineered to manage the air, to smooth it down at the flanks, to use it to cool the brakes and to feed the chimney pot on the roof. And to help plant that rear into the road at speed. That rear wing, for example, is so big that as you go past 156mph, it lowers itself a bit or the downforce would be so great, it'd break the suspension.

Strange, then, that if you study the detailing carefully, you will notice that the McLaren Nike-style ‘tick' badge is used everywhere. Headlights, bonnet scoops, flanks. Who knew it was so aerodynamic, I ask, with a little bit of a raised eyebrow.

Anyway, after pottering around Bruges for a day, I then engaged both engines and headed onto the motorway, where the McLaren continued to be two things at the same time. Fast and easy. First of all, because it uses the same sort of suspension set-up as the 12C, where none of the dots are joined up with anything more solid than a few volts, the ride is sublime. Citroen-from-the-old-days good.

It's a doddle to drive as well. The gears change smoothly. The steering is super-light. If you shut your eyes, you could be in a squidgy wingback. What's more, it is equipped with electric windows, climate control and satnav, which, in traditional McLaren style, doesn't work. Sure, the carpets are an optional extra, but you can solve that by fitting them at no extra cost. And, at 80mph, the big engine can be a bit boomy. But you can solve that by turning it off and using electricity for a few minutes.

You'd imagine that, on a normal road, a car made from carbon fibre that's unlacquered to save weight, military-grade aluminium and space-age ceramics would be about as relaxing as riding a tiger. But it isn't. You could drive this car, easily, from London to India. You just have to remember to forget all you think you know when you press the accelerator. Because what happens when you do isn't real. It's from a world of sci-fi and monsters and fear.

We do a shot when we are filming TopGear. The camera car pulls into the inside lane and slows down. I then drop back and floor it, zooming past the camera in a blur and flurry of noise. We've done that with every car we've ever filmed. But you can't do it in a P1 because if you drop back to a point where you are not visible and floor it, you will be doing 217mph when you pass the camera. That's great television, but you wouldn't be able to stop before you reached the traffic in front. So then there'd be an accident, and you'd have to go to prison.

Full throttle in a P1 is like Christmas. It's something that you can only use once a year. And even then only briefly, because it actually hurts. When this car accelerates, it beats you up. It hurts your face. It's like Christmas in other ways too. It causes arguments with your loved ones. And it's great. Oh, and when you are going flat out, you can push a button marked DRS, which lowers the rear wing. This reduces drag and lets you go even faster. But when would you ever need more speed in a car that has 903bhp and less fat than Willem Dafoe?

There's another button marked Boost. Push that and, weirdly, you lose around 150bhp. But it hasn't actually gone anywhere. It's all sitting in a big, spare power jar, and if you push a button on the wheel, it all comes back. I can think of no occasion when this would be useful. Except just after your passenger has crapped themselves, you can say: "Huh. You think that's fast? Watch this."

It's strange, though, isn't it? McLaren has always been the most anal of the F1 teams. Nobody has ever dropped into its big grey motorhome for a giggle and a natter. And yet here is a car that has Boost and DRS features that are fitted for... fun.

I've never been a fan of McLaren's road cars. I always hated the F1 and didn't really buy the argument that its engine bay was lined with gold because that's the best heat-resistant material. Interestingly, they tried to use gold in the P1, but it failed the heat test.

Then there was the SLR, which was a Mercedes SL with rubbish brakes and a silly pricetag. And then there was the MP4-12C. A very good car, but a bit clinical. And that name was stupid. Though it's not as bad, if I'm honest, as P1. It's just so knowing. So ‘in'. I hate it when the commentators say P1, when they mean ‘pole', and I hate that McLaren has used it too. Especially as their cars haven't actually been on pole since, er, they started working on the P1.

Everything else about this car, though, is either very brilliant or stratospherically brilliant. I love the way McLaren's hijacked green hybrid technology and used it to create more speed. I love the way it all worked. I love the underlying British sense of humour and, with that back wing up, I love the way it looks.

It sounds pretty meaty, as well. Like a docker clearing his throat before eating a crane. The speed? Yes, I know I said the Ferrari F12 had gone beyond reasonable boundaries, but that thing's a road car designed to be used by the owners of carpet warehouses in Huddersfield. The P1 is more of an event. An engineering boasting book. A thumb to the nose and four wiggled fingers in the general direction of those who thought we might have reached the outside of the performance envelope.

I have no doubt that the forthcoming Porsche 918 and the Ferrari TheFerrari will be fast and intoxicating as well. But I will be staggered if they are better than McLaren's giant leap for mankind. I really will.

Words: Jeremy Clarkson

Pictures: James Lipman/ Justin Leighton

Source: http://www.topgear.c...n-P1-2013-12-09

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is another article from Top Gear UK, about the performance figures of the car which I’d like to call ‘They Widow Maker’, the New McLaren P1.

post-50246-0-69438300-1392112965_thumb.j

Brace yourselves people, for McLaren has announced the performance figures for the P1. The numbers are alarmingly… small. And also quite big – the claimed combined fuel figure, for instance, is 34.0 mpg.

But that’s not the one you’re really after is it? Here’s what you really need to know.

0-62mph (100 kmph): 2.8secs

0-124mph (200 kmph): 6.8secs

0-186mph (300 kmph): 16.5secs

Standing quarter (0.4 kms): 9.8secs at 152mph

There, that ought to do it. McLaren has laid down the gauntlet to LaFerrari, and trounced the Porsche 918 (2.8 and 7.9 are the comparative times for the 0-62 and 124mph figures). It’s clearly as fast as we’d hoped, and then some. But then it does have 903bhp and 664lb ft of torque pushing along just 1,395kg, making for a pretty punchy power to weight ratio of 647bhp/tonne.

Of course, the question everyone will want answered is: does this consign the Veyron Super Sport to the supercar graveyard? No, not quite. Both have almost identical power to weight ratios (644bhp/tonne for the ultimate Veyron), but against the clock the Veyron (aided, don’t forget by 4wd) is claimed to do 0-62mph in 2.5 secs, 124mph in 6.7secs and 186mph in 14.6secs. Standing quarter in 9.7secs. And of course, as it isn’t limited to 217mph (350 kmph), goes on to top 268mph (431 kmph).

But still, we weren’t sure we’d ever see the Veyron matched, and now it has been. And by a hybrid at that, which also returns 194g/km of CO2 and is therefore cleaner than an Audi TT RS or a Lotus Evora. Our minds are blown. And being so much lighter, you’ve got to expect that the P1 will feel more visceral, less blunt instrument.

And it’s not just the going, but the stopping of the McLaren, too. Braking from 186mph takes just 6.2 seconds, during which you’ll cover 246 metres. At more sane speeds, you’ll stop from 60mph in 30.2 metres. The highway code suggests the typical braking distance is 55 metres.

About the only figure McLaren hasn’t given us is the lateral g. Given the size of that rear wing, we’d expect it to pull several.

post-50246-0-19158900-1392113421_thumb.j

Source: http://www.topgear.c...tats-2013-10-21

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

McLaren released a video about the New P1’s ‘sub-seven minute’ lap of the Nurburgring.

Driven by McLaren’s chief test driver Chris Goodwin, the P1 attempted the lap in Race mode, which means the rear wing is fully extended by 300mm and the suspension stiffened by 300 per cent. It did however run on standard fully road-legal Pirelli Pirelli P Zero Corse tyres.

[media=]

http://youtu.be/E9IWiTpWeiM[/media]

Despite the fact McLaren has no plans to release the final Ring lap time, the video does give a taste of how quick the P1 is around the Green Hell.

McLaren also released some interesting stats about the lap, including peak cornering force of 3.9g at the Karussell, and the fact a gearchange was made every six seconds on average.

The car’s F1-inspired drag reduction system was also deployed for a total of nine per cent of the lap, increasing maximum speed due to a 60 per cent decrease in downforce on the straights.

The Widow Maker is priced at £866,000 (approx. Rs.8.85 crores) which is equivalent to a Pagani Huayra, but lesser than an Aston Martin One-77 or the Bugatti Veyron.

The new McLaren P1 will be limited to 375 units, all of them (sadly for us) set to be left-hand drive!

post-50246-0-96672100-1392115379_thumb.j

Source: http://www.evo.co.uk...ring_video.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know what you all would be wondering.. Exactly how far under seven minutes did the New McLaren P1 go?

post-50246-0-81765200-1392116905_thumb.j

Well, as i wrote above, McLaren has only revealed that the P1 achieved a Nurburgring lap time starting with a ‘six'. Which necessitated an average speed in excess of 111mph (178 kmph) around the 13 mile (20.92 kms) track.

McLaren has also revealed that the P1 hit its 205mph (330 kmph) top speed on the Dottinger Hohe straight. But McLaren won't say by how many seconds its car broke the seven-minute barrier!!

Cynics suggest, that's maybe because the P1 failed to beat the 6m 57s lap time set by its arch-rival, the Porsche 918. The truth, no doubt, shall be out... Soon!!

And whatever the P1's precise time, there's no doubt a sub-seven minute lap is unbelievably fast. The Porsche 911 GT2 RS, for comparison, recorded a 7m 24s lap in 2010 and the Ferrari Enzo went round in 7m 25.7s in 2008.

In the world of licence-plate-wearing (road legal) production cars, only the 918 and a pair of barely road legal Radicals have cracked seven minutes around the Green Hell i.e. the Nurburgring!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So.. After reading everything i had to say about the New McLaren P1.. Do you want the 903bhp hypercar?

Well.. You can't have it!!! All 375 units have been SOLD OUT!!

Barely eight months after its breathless reveal at the 2013 Geneva Motor Show, McLaren has confirmed its P1 supercar has been sold out.

In their words.. 'Accounted for’, meaning each and every one of the 375 models have either been sold already or secured by a deposit. In fact, a McLaren spokesman revealed how the waiting list is still growing.

But still.. If you're a bit flush with cash and fancy a super-exclusive, hybrid hypercar with around 900bhp and mind-bending speed, there's the Porsche 918 Spyder and LaFerrari. At least, i think there is...

post-50246-0-78585600-1392118831_thumb.j

Source: http://www.topgear.c...-out-2013-11-13

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

would be going to the Mclaren factory soon :D will upload some pics of F1 & P1

The car has outstanding presence, but it ruins the desgine language of the renowned F1. They are working on Buggati killer also, so expect a new car around the corner in 2 years

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

would be going to the Mclaren factory soon :D will upload some pics of F1 & P1

The car has outstanding presence, but it ruins the desgine language of the renowned F1. They are working on Buggati killer also, so expect a new car around the corner in 2 years

Sarabjeet!! That's awesome!! I would be eagerly waiting for some pics from the McLaren factory!!

Yes i do agree.. The car has an outstanding presence!!

But i do not agree with what you said about the P1 ruining the design language of the F1.

Look at cars produced by other manufacturers during that period.. The Ferrari 456 or the Ferrari F50 or even the Lamborghini Diablo.. And now compare it with cars of today like the Ferrari LaFerrari or the Lamborghini Veneno.. The design language is worlds apart!!

And.. I am not a big fan of the one family (similar) design language that carmakers have been following lately!!

I believe that each car should have its own independent identity. So ya, with all due respect.. We have a difference in opinion!!

Other than that.. Thanks for the heads up!! Regarding what we should be expecting from McLaren in next couple of years!! :)

Even i am a Top Gear fan but see only the specials. The way Jeremy Clarckson gives reviews are so interesting and humourous :D . And he can be called the god in this field :P

I agree.. I follow Top Gear UK religiously!! They are the best!!

I believe that TG UK is the epitome of excellence when it comes to automotive journalism!!

Love them!! Especially Jezza (Jeremy Clarkson).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this